Post by account_disabled on Jan 23, 2024 7:35:12 GMT
The loss of the right to remedy the defect. First, the right to remedy it is established. Afterwards, the consequence of not doing so within the maximum period provided by law is stipulated. And the consequence is the loss of the right to remedy the addiction. In this sense, when the courts analyze whether — after the deadline for rectifying the defect has passed — the consumer (who makes his choice among the three provided by law) has or not this right in situations in which the supplier — after the legal deadline — rectifies the defect, it is necessary to analyze and verify the nature of the deadline.
Can the supplier remedy the defect Buy Phone Number List after the legal deadline? Is the consumer obliged to accept the product delivered after the legal deadline? The answer cannot be separated from the analysis of the nature of the statute of limitations provided for in the standard. When, on the other hand, a period of 30 or 90 days is established to complain about defects in products, the consequence is established that — if this period is not respected — the consumer loses the right to have it remedied, and cannot impose on the supplier to remedy the apparent defect after this period. Likewise, when — in reverse — the supplier (who has the right to remedy the defect) fails to use the maximum period, he cannot force the consumer to accept the remedied product back.
On the contrary, the law states that there is a choice to be made, and it is up to the consumer. The consequence of verifying that the deadline for rectifying defects is of a prescriptive nature must be the absolute respect for the consumer's right to triple choice, even if the supplier — after the deadline, after losing the right to remedy the defect — comes to remedy it posteriorly. Determining the connection between actions, for prevention, is the exclusive choice of the judge. This is because the mechanism, created to avoid contradictory decisions, does not need to be used if the causes of action are different, despite the fact being the same.
Can the supplier remedy the defect Buy Phone Number List after the legal deadline? Is the consumer obliged to accept the product delivered after the legal deadline? The answer cannot be separated from the analysis of the nature of the statute of limitations provided for in the standard. When, on the other hand, a period of 30 or 90 days is established to complain about defects in products, the consequence is established that — if this period is not respected — the consumer loses the right to have it remedied, and cannot impose on the supplier to remedy the apparent defect after this period. Likewise, when — in reverse — the supplier (who has the right to remedy the defect) fails to use the maximum period, he cannot force the consumer to accept the remedied product back.
On the contrary, the law states that there is a choice to be made, and it is up to the consumer. The consequence of verifying that the deadline for rectifying defects is of a prescriptive nature must be the absolute respect for the consumer's right to triple choice, even if the supplier — after the deadline, after losing the right to remedy the defect — comes to remedy it posteriorly. Determining the connection between actions, for prevention, is the exclusive choice of the judge. This is because the mechanism, created to avoid contradictory decisions, does not need to be used if the causes of action are different, despite the fact being the same.